Tuesday, November 30, 2010

George Barna Survey: “Accountability” by Stephen Crosby

In the results of a recent survey by George Barna, he states that only about 5% of Christians believe their church does anything to hold them behaviorally accountable. There is general “bemoaning” of these results. Indeed, they are sad, but not for the reason most would expect. I think part of the problem is in the wording of the question:  Does the “church” do anything to hold you accountable? The question is based on some faulty presuppositions.

I don’t think  the “church” should hold anyone “accountable.”

Genuine Christianity only “works” on one platform:  relational one-anotherness (animated by His resurrection life). I do not look  to the “church” to hold me accountable. I look toward brothers and sisters with whom who I walk, to love me, and care for me, not “hold me accountable.” Love is  expressed by care, including rebuke and discipline, not by reporting in to my “accountability  partner.”

Since the American Constantinian church is intrinsically  individualistic and independent, it is only logical that real care of a quality of Jesus’ kingdom,  will be unlikely. We expect some nebulous system of “church” to police me, sheriff  me, to make sure I am being a good boy according to the performance  metrics of whatever group I belong to.

Every group has it’s articulated and unarticulated behavioral expectations. They often have no relationship whatsoever to any biblical mandate, but merely reflect social and cultural sensitivities, priorities and preferences, of the group.

I can be utterly accountable behaviorally, and be a  complete relational fraud with God and humanity.  It’s called . . . faking it for the incentive of reward that my particular group metes out for those who  play according to the behavioral expectations of the group. I can check off my weekly do and don’t do list, to perfection, report in to my accountability group or overseer, and be relationally alienated from God and humanity. Since relational integration is the definition of the fulfillment of all righteousness (Mark 12:30 ff., Luke 10:27, John 15:12),  our behavioral “accountability” means nothing, in and of itself. A cultist can have biblically impeccable behavior, and have neither right relationship with God nor humanity.

Right relationships will manifest in right behavior (because I am “others” aware), but right behaviors do not categorically  produce right relationships. If perfect behavior was the path to right relationship, Jesus’ incarnation would not have been necessary. Humanity’s condition is one of relational alienation manifesting in sin. Humanity’s problem is not at its root a behavioral one. It is a relational one. We needed a Savior to be restored to right relationship.

So when Barna asks the question, we point  at the deficiency of the “church,” not realizing that we are the  church and the reason no one is holding me accountable, is my own fault  because I am not walking in relational reality with anyone, just paying my weekly homage at the shrine of conservative Constantinianism.

I know it may be fussing with terms, but accountability is a “non-biblical”  term. As I said in my books (Authority, Accountability, and the Apostolic Movement, The Silent Killers of Faith), it’s a poor attempt of the Adamic  nature to try to accomplish through monitored performance metrics, what only  Spirit-empowered discipleship and relational one-anotherness can accomplish, as  we embrace his death and resurrection life . . . one with another.

So, the data is sad, but not for the reason most would  think.

Copyright 2010 Dr. Stephen R. Crosby www.drstevecrosby.wordpress.com. Permission to copy, forward, or distribute this article is granted as long as this copyright byline is maintained in all duplications, copies, and link references

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please click Follow above to follow blog

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.